Tracking technology litigation continues to evolve and expand, driven by increasingly sophisticated data collection techniques, broader use of session replay, identity resolution, AI-driven profiling, and growing scrutiny from plaintiffs, regulators, and courts over whether companies are adequately disclosing, governing, and technically controlling how user data is collected, shared, and monetized.
As lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny targeting “data brokers” continue to accelerate, understanding whether your organization fits within this increasingly broad industry space is a critical risk management priority. The stakes have never been higher for entities that collect, enrich, or license data to understand the evolving causes of action, damages theories, and defense strategies shaping this space.
With the influx of new state AI laws making compliance more complicated, we have created a new state AI law tracker map.
The map focuses on laws that can directly or indirectly affect private-sector AI development and deployment. As such, the map tracks the AI laws most likely to
On January 1, the California Delete Act went into effect establishing new requirements for entities that qualify as “data brokers” under the law. Beginning August 1, covered businesses will need to process deletion requests through the California Privacy Protection Agency’s (CalPrivacy) centralized mechanism — with fines of $200 per day
Join us for the first installment of our series, “Data Brokers Under Fire: Litigation and Compliance Strategies to Help Temper the Flames.”
With state legislatures reconvening for 2026, numerous states are considering privacy and AI bills on a broad range of topics. In the AI space, these bills cover high-risk activities, chatbots, pricing, disclosures, provenance, employment, and health, among other topics. In the privacy space, these bills cover consumer data privacy, teen’s privacy, biometric privacy, consumer health data privacy, and data brokers.
Register Here
Tuesday, February 17 • 12:00 – 1:00 p.m. ET
Please join Alison Grounds, David Stauss, Jessica Davis, and Jennifer Doran for a discussion on the ethical and compliant use of Generative AI, including how ethics rules, privacy laws, and court obligations intersect with these tools. The speakers will
This year, our focus is simple: privacy with a purpose.
For us, that means two things.
In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape and expanded threat landscape, financial institutions feel at war and are under increasing pressure to balance innovation, data privacy, and regulatory demands. AI is accelerating that complexity, reshaping how organizations manage sensitive information and comply with a rapidly shifting legal environment.
